Sectarian divide 

The act of partaking Kanday Da Pahul - commonly referred to as amrit - is supposed to unite Sikhs. Instead, it is becoming the source of disunity. DARSHAN SINGH brings to our attention of an interview with Sikh preacher (parcharak) Bhai Ranjit Singh Dhadrianwale

2
1426
Opinion | Malaysia | 27 June 2017 | Asia Samachar |

Recently, while I was cleaning up my phone memory, scrolling through the many audio video clips and pictures forwarded by friends, I noticed a very interesting video clip by Bhai Ranjit Singh Khalsa Dhadrianwale, a man who has been my source of inspiration. Being a true visionary, with a significant global outreach, Bhai Ranjit Singh has achieved so much in a short span of time, making many envious of not only his outreach, but also valuable insights which are logical and fierce in nature.

In this particular video clip recorded in the form of an interview, Bhai Ranjit Singh touches on issues relating to the root cause of current panthik disunity.

We stand witness to some ugly scenes at Gurdwaras worldwide, some even justifying the presence of police to enforce law and order. In fact, recently an elderly parcharak was violently attacked in our own backyard and this has tainted our reputation. [See here].

So, back to the interview video clip. Bhai Ranjit Singh analyses and concludes that our disunity begins from the holy “Amrit Baata” itself, given the varying maryada (code of conduct) governing it’s administration. Maryadas, among others, are those imposed by the Taksaal, Nanaksar, Hazoor Sahib, Rara Sahib, Nihang Singh and Akal Takht Sahib. How true!

THE INTERVIEW: 

ਸਪੈਸ਼ਲ ਿੲੰਟਰਿਵਉ | ਪੰਥ ਨੂੰ ਜੋੜਨ ਦੀਆਂ ‘ਅਰਦਾਸਾ’ ਕਰਨ ਵਾਿਲਓ, ਪਹਿਲਾਂ ਿੲਹ ਦੇੇਖੋ ਿਕ ਪੰਥ ਨੂੰ ਤੋਿੜਆ ਿਕਸਨੇ

Funny how disunity simmers into a previously united family should members partake the Holy Amrit from different institutions. Members of that same family are unable to sit together due to the imposition of varying rules of conduct.

For example, one maryada forbids meat consumption, while the other allows intake of non-slaughtered meat. One says the Mool Mantra ends at Gurparsad, while for the other it is up to Nanak Hosi Bhi Sach. One demands that we recite five bania in the morning, but the other says three minimum compulsory would suffice. One says that the Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji is our eternal Guru,  while the other preaches the existence of controversial Bachitar Natak as its younger brother.

Going back in time, the intent of the Amrit by our Tenth Master Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji was to unite Sikhs transcending cast and creed by forming the Khalsa brotherhood, but unfortunately politics did not spare our religion. In current times, the Amrit in itself is being manipulated by various sects intending to cause disunity. Worth asking, would our Tenth Master have permitted  the rise of multiple maryadas?

The happenings in Malaysia are no different, as we are at the brink of disaster ourselves due to this modified concept of Sikhi, propagated by mischievously dangerous individuals, totally disregarding the established rules of the Sikh Rehat Maryada (SRM) which is sanctioned by the Akaal Takht Sahib, our supreme decision making authority.

Our sanggat is already falling prey to concerted efforts of a handful, imposing new beliefs, disrupting unity in the process. It is rather unfortunate that parbandaks of Gurdwaras who are duty bound to protect the SRM chose to play politics by aligning themselves to these deviant sects.

It is time that we put our minds together for exploring solutions in addressing the dilemma of disunity which threatens to destroy us from within. It is evident that the concepts of Sikhi is being strategically challenged, bringing about new ideologies to tear us apart.

It is critically important, especially now, that we unite on the back of uniformity under the established principles of the SRM, for the sake of our upcoming generations. The SRM, developed to support the religious needs of a Sikh householder, has undoubtedly kept the essence of Sikhi alive, transcending the boundaries of time for decades and running. Going beyond the present, it is the future that really matters.

Worth mulling, why the sudden desire by a handful to introduce their own sectarian rules and beliefs in Malaysia? Is there a hidden agenda to indirectly weaken Sikhi, first by dividing, then slowly diminishing it?

While these sects would not want to see unity for fear of their own irrelevance, parbandaks and sanggat at large must continue to vehemently oppose them.

Let us take a moment and ask, are we doing justice to Sikhi by choosing to compromise the SRM? Do we want to divide ourselves into groups?

Darshan Singh Dhillon is an avid writer on consumerism and also a member of the Malaysian Gurdwaras Council (MGC) executive committee

* This is the opinion of the writer, organisation or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Asia Samachar.

 

[ASIA SAMACHAR is an online newspaper for Sikhs in Southeast Asia and surrounding countries. We have a Facebook page, do give it a LIKE. Follow us on Twitter. Visit our website: www.asiasamachar.com]

RELATED NEWS:

Malaysia Indian Blueprint pushes Sikhs back to pre-2008 (Asia Samachar, 9 June 2017)

Dasam Granth ‘parkash’ in Kuala Lumpur serious transgression of maryada, says MGC (Asia Samachar, 29 Dec 2016)

Panth Ekta over ‘Dasam Granth’ (Asia Samachar, 28 Sept 2016)

The God of Dasam Granth – Part One (Asia Samachar, 1 Aug 2016)

2 COMMENTS

  1. It’s clear that bachitar natak (@dasam granth) only serves to divide the Sikhs. Look at the recent disunity in the Malaysian Sikh community over this.

    Bachitar natak is poison and it should not be allowed to spread.

    Waheguru ji ka Khalsa waheguru ji Ki fateh

    Ps: do not call it dasam granth. It is called bachitar natak. Calling it dasam granth somewhat confers some credibility to this poison.

  2. It is a common belief that RELIGIONS UNITE their respective followers. But looking at the world’s religions it may be concluded that none of the religions unite their followers
    Most leaderships of almost all religions appear to be acting more for personal interest and greed rather than for the benefit of their respective followers. It appears to be evident that the main objective of most religious leaders is to accumulate most wealth the use of it is to construct more and more grand buildings to be referred to as prayer houses in addition to luxurious life styles for those who are trustees of such religion funds and in the process some trustees may have indulged in fraud and corrupt practices for self enrichment while advising followers that possession of material wealth should not be the objective to reach the Almighty and thus heaven.
    Most religious trust funds are most susciptible to fraud and corruption and abuse of power as most Managements of religious trust funds may be without effective procedures or internal controls or monitoring and may lack ACCOUNTABILITY and TRANSPARENCY in respect of Trust Funds Financial Statements and their usage as most are never made public but restricted to registered members many of whom may be either supporters of Mgt Members or indifferent to financial management.
    It is another common perception that the most abused entity may be in the mame of the respective Almighty when it comes to funds and wealth and resources. This may be the main cause of disputes for positions on Mgt C’tees especially those with substantial funds. The contest may not be for positions to SEVA but CONTROL OF FUNDS and ASSETS and RESOURCES.
    My solution has been to stay away from orhanized religion and to seek direct connecion with the Almighty as I have lost faith in most SEVADAARS as it is not possible to distinguish the homest from the imposters.
    Gur Fateh

LEAVE A REPLY