MGC: Parkash of Bachitar Natak (Dasam Granth) in Darbar of SRI GURU GRANTH SAHIB JI in violation of SRM

1
1727

| Statement | Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia29 Dec 2016 Asia Samachar |

EXPRESSING CONCERN: MGC letter expressing concern on the perceived SRM violation with the ‘parkash’ of Bachitar Natak, which was later known as Dasam Granth, at Gurdwara Sahib Titiwangsa in December 2016. A copy of the letter, sent to all gurdwaras in Malaysia, was also sent to Asia Samachar – PHOTO / ASIA SAMACHAR

 

28th December 2016

To All Gurdwaras, The President/ Secretary

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa, Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh

Re: Parkash of Bachitar Natak (Dasam Granth) in Darbar of SRI GURU GRANTH SAHIB JI in violation of SRM.

The Sikhinside had telecast live on 26.12.2016, the Parkash of Bachitar Natak (Dasam Granth) in the Darbar of  SRI GURU GRANTH SAHIB JI at Gurdwara Sahib Titiwangsa, Kuala Lumpur which is a serious violation of the Panthic Parvanat Sikh Rehat Maryada (SRM).

The Historical evidence is that Bachitar Natak (now called Dasam Granth) was earlier known by other names. That there was no Bachitar Natak (Dasam Granth) in existence at the time of Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji’s Joti Jot in 1708.

We do not know whether the Parkash of BN (DG) is on a permanent basis in the Darbar of Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji (SGGS Ji) at Gurdwara Sahib Titiwangsa. Even if the Parkash is on a temporary basis, it is still a violation of the SRM as no Parkash of any other “Pustak” can be done in the Darbar of SGGS Ji. The BN (DG) ‘Parkash” could have been done in another room but not in Darbar of SGGS Ji.

As guidance, in some Gurdwaras overseas, those doing BN (DG) reading in Darbar Sahib have been banned from doing Kirtan/Katha in the Gurdwaras.

The Gurdwaras were reminded by MGC vide letter dated 05-09-2016 to remain united. At a meeting called by M.G.C. on 7th August 2016 and attended by representatives of MGC, KDM, SNSM, Melaka Vidyala and Sikh Scholar’s a unanimous decision was taken that all Gurdwaras and Sikhs must abide by the SRM which hitherto had bound the Sikhs World wide like a glue.

SEE ALSO: Dasam Granth ‘parkash’ in Kuala Lumpur serious transgression of maryada, says MGC

SEE VIDEO SOURCE: SIKHINSIDE

Not complying with SRM will bring disaster and disunity among the Sikhs. Just imagine having different Maryada regarding reciting Kirtan, Hukam Lena, Sadharan Path, Akhand Path, Gurbani di Katha, Anand Sanskar etc. if SRM as the uniting force is not followed.

The following are Manmat Practises stated in the live telecast:

1) That it is a parampra at Lakhi Jungle Gurdwara to do Parkash of Dasam Granth at par with SGGS Ji.

ANSWER

After Banda Singh Bahadur’s demise in 1716, the Sikhs were hunted and bounty placed on their heads. During this time anti Sikh forces took control of Gurdwaras and many manmat and anti Sikh practises were introduced.

The Panth after deliberating from 1932 to 1945 approved the SRM in 1945 and outlawed many prevailing manmat and anti Sikh practises.

In Lakhi Jungle Gurdwara, there is Parkash of 3 “Granth”, and not two as was stated in the live telecast, One is Dhan-Dhan Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji and there is also Parkash of  BN (DG) and Sarabloh Granth.

The Parkash at Titiwangsa Gurdwara of the BN (DG) is a clear violation of the SRM, although the Parkash may be on a temporary basis. The quoted Parampra of Lakhi Jungle is Manmat and is a serious transgression of SRM.

WHY HAS ACADEMY and Gurdwara Sahib Titiwangsa not followed the Harmandir Sahib Parampra of removing BN (DG) from Harmandir Sahib in 1923. Also removed from Harmandir Sahib was Bhagwat Geeta and Hindu Godess statues.

There can be only one Guru or Emperor on the throne at one time or place.

 

2) That BN (DG) Parkash was done in Harmandir Sahib until 1945.

ANSWER

Why was BN (DG) REMOVED FROM HARMANDIR SAHIB around 1923 (and not 1945 as claimed in the live video).

This was because, the Parkash of BN (DG) in the presence of  SGGS Ji was a manmat and was a serious transgression.

Therefore, the BN (DG) and numerous statues of Hindu Goddess were removed from Harmandir Sahib in 1920’s, too.

Thus the Parkash of BN (DG) in Darbar of SGGS Ji, is taking PANTH back to the old Brahminical ways, from which we were liberated with the removal of BN (DG) from Harmandir Sahib in 1923.

3) The SRM (pg.11J) provides: 

” ਸ੍ਰੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਜੀ ਦੇ ਵਾਕਰ (ਤੁੱਲ) ਕਿਸੇ ਪੁਸਤਕ ਨੂੰ ਅਸਥਾਪਨ ਨਹੀਂ ਕਰਨਾ “

The relevant words in SRM are “Kitab”, “Parkash” and “Vakar” and in bracket “Tul”.

This means there can be only ONE GRANTH in DARBAR. All others are “kitabs”, and Kitabs don’t come in rumalas, manji, chaur, asan etc.

Therefore, Parkash of BN (DG) in Darbar of SGGS Ji has resulted in the following transgressions:

  1. To make the DG Kitab/book into a “granth” by faulty actions.
  2. To install it and give it the same reverence as SGGS Ji and in the presence of SGGS Ji.
  3. The closest word to “Tul” is Barabar (see Akal Takhat Gurmatta-1, where word Barabar is used) and in English is “on par”.

By putting rumalas, manji, chaur, asan, etc, the DG has been put on par with SGGS Ji.

The question of saying that BN (DG) is always placed one or two inches lower and placement is on left is nothing but to pull wool over the eyes.

In the DARBAR there can be only and only ONE AUTHORITY and to which to Tek Matha.

There can be none other to challenge it whether sitting on the same height or lower or to the right or left.

Sikh Neh Siraf SGGS Ji teh hi Nihcha rakhni hai ji, ehi Gurbani dha farmaan hai.

ਹਰਿ ਇਕੋ ਦਾਤਾ ਸੇਵੀਐ ਹਰਿ ਇਕੁ ਧਿਆਈਐ ॥

ਹਰਿ ਇਕੋ ਦਾਤਾ ਮੰਗੀਐ ਮਨ ਚਿੰਦਿਆ ਪਾਈਐ ॥

ਜੇ ਦੂਜੇ ਪਾਸਹੁ ਮੰਗੀਐ ਤਾ ਲਾਜ ਮਰਾਈਐ ॥

(Ang 590 SGGS Ji)

[You must Serve and worship only ONE MASTER]

 

Conclusion

The Gurdwaras must take note of the above serious transgression of the SRM.

The MGC had warned earlier that such actions will lead to disunity and we have been proven right.

The MGC EXCO will meet urgently to decide on the next cause of action to be taken at this serious transgression of SRM and the clear Hukam of Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji :

 

“SABH SIKHAN KO HUKAM HAI GURU MANIO GRANTH”

 

Guru Gobind Singh Ji had himself bowed before Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji (the only Granth in Parkash), and bestowed “Gurta Gaddi” only on this Guru Granth Sahib Ji. Sikhs do not have any other Guru (Shabad Guru) except Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji.

 

The Gurmata-1 by Akal Takhat dated 6.6.2008 refers to DG (BN) as “Literature & History” only and not even bani, let alone Gurbani, We quote from the Said Gurmatta:

Translation:

The whole of Sikh Panth is hereby informed that DG is an inseparable part of Sikh Litreture and Sikh History, but Guru Gobind Singh Ji did not award it the status equal to SGGS Ji. Guruship had been bestowed only and only on SGGS Ji. Due to this, no other Granth can be installed “Parkash” like and on par with SGGS Ji.

 

ਧੰਨਵਾਦ ਮਹਿਤ

 

  (Signed)

……………………….

Jagir Singh

President

Malaysian Gurdwaras Council

 

 

 

[ASIA SAMACHAR is an online newspaper for Sikhs in Southeast Asia and surrounding countries. We have a Facebook page, do give it a LIKE. Follow us on Twitter. Visit our website: www.asiasamachar.com]

RELATED STORIES:

Statement from Gurdwara Sahib Selayang Baru  (Asia Samachar, 19 Dec 2016)

Selayang incident: I’m appalled with the lies (Asia Samachar, 18 Dec 2016)

Attempted assault on Dr Karminder Singh after talk at Selayang gurdwara (Asia Samachar, 17 Dec 2016)

Driven towards fundamentalism (Asia Samachar, 16 Dec 2016)

‘Ek Granth, Ek Panth, Ek Maryada’ comes to Rawang (Asia Samachar, 15 Dec 2016)

Dr Anurag’s claims on Ek Granth defective to the core, says Dr Karminder (Asia Samachar, 11 Dec 2016)

Kuala Pilah Sikhs lend an ear to ‘Ek Granth, Ek Panth, Ek Maryada’ concept (Asia Samachar, 4 Dec 2016)

Perlis Sikhs do sehaj paath for Ek Panth, Ek Granth, Ek Maryada (Asia Samachar, 30 Nov 016)

Global Sikh body backs Malaysia, US councils (Asia Samachar, 29 Nov 016)

American Sikh Council endorses the “One Granth and One Panth” (Asia Samachar, 28 Nov 2016)

Seremban leadership endorses ‘Ek Granth, Ek Panth, Ek Maryada’ (Asia Samachar, 27 Nov 2016)

Klang gurdwara makes history with launch of ‘Ek Granth, Ek Panth, Ek Maryada’ (Asia Samachar, 24 Nov 016)

Ek Granth, Ek Panth, Ek Maryada: A logo that says it all (Asia Samachar, 3 Nov 016)

All is not well at Akal Takht (Asia Samachar, 20 Oct 2016)

Guru Nanak was an original, says Women In Sikhi conference organiser (Asia Samachar, 16 Oct 2016)

Lord Singh of Wimbledon on Dasam Granth  (Asia Samachar, 10 Oct 2016)

SGGS-DG Discourse: Another stumbling block towards Ekta of the Sikh panth? (Asia Samachar, 4 Aug 2016)

‘One Granth One Panth’ call from Global Sikh Council (Asia Samachar, 11 April 2016)

Foreign maids voted at Ipoh gurdwara AGM, MGC ‘regrets’ police presence (Asia Samachar, 3 March 2016)

Ipoh gurdwara AGM: Another volunteer held, lorry driver vows to ‘get back their membership’ (Asia Samachar, 2 March 2016)

Ipoh gurdwara president defends actions, says no more response from him (Asia Samachar, 1 March 2016)

Police show up at Ipoh gurdwara AGM (Asia Samachar, 28 Feb 2016)

 JAGIR: MGC managing granthi entry, tandardising maryada at gurdwaras  (Asia Samachar, 19 Nov 2015)

 

1 COMMENT

  1. ” Parkash of Bachitar Natak (Dasam Granth) in Darbar of SRI GURU GRANTH SAHIB JI in violation of SRM”

    IT IS NOT ONLY VIOLATION OF THE SRM, BUT THE JURIST GURU GRANTH SAHIB AND THE GURU SAHIBAANS.

    “The Sikhinside had telecast live on 26.12.2016, the Parkash of Bachitar Natak (Dasam Granth) in the Darbar of SRI GURU GRANTH SAHIB JI at Gurdwara Sahib Titiwangsa, Kuala Lumpur which is a serious violation of the Panthic Parvanat Sikh Rehat Maryada (SRM)”.
    —————————————————————————————————————
    THE SIKHINSIDE SITE HAS BEEN KNOWN IN ITS ERNEST TO SHARE KIRTAN NOT CAREFUL OR DISCERNING AND DOES NOT UNDERSTAND THAT MORE THAN OFTEN THEY ARE VIOLATING THE SIKH CODE BY SHARING DISPLAYS THAT ARE NOT SIKHI.

    IT APPEARS TO BE QUITE A IRRESPONBILE SITE THAT IT DOES NOT UNDERSTAND THE SRM, NOR THE CODE OF SIKHI.THESE ARE YOUNG PEOPLE, WHO THINK ANYTHING IS SIKHI,WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING A LOT OF UNSIKH ACTIVITY DOES TAKES PLACE.THEY NEED TO GET THEIR ACT RIGHT, AND ABIDE BY THE SIKH CODE WHEN TELECASTINGM, AS AT THE MOMENT THEY ARE PARTY TO ANTI SIKH ACTS.

    “The Historical evidence is that Bachitar Natak (now called Dasam Granth) was earlier known by other names. That there was no Bachitar Natak (Dasam Granth) in existence at the time of Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji’s Joti Jot in 1708”

    IT IS NOT ONLY HISTORICAL, BUT FACTAUL THAT IT WAS NOT IN PLACE AT TIME OF GURU GOBIND SINGH, NEITHER A PROPER TIMELINE OF THE GURUS LIFE INDICATE HE HAD ANY TIME FOR SUCH IRELEVANT WRITINGS

    THE LEGISLATIVE ACTS AND THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA TOO HAS RECOGNISED THAT A GURDUARA IS WHERE THE JURIST GURU GRANTH SAHIB ONLY IS PLACED.

    THE “GURDUARAS” THAT MAY HAVE THE DISPLAY OF BN ARE NOT MAINSTREAM GURDUARAS, BUT THAT BELONG TO EITHER SOME DERA OR THE FALSE TKSAALI CULT, OUT TO HOODWINK SIKHS

    The Gurdwaras were reminded by MGC vide letter dated 05-09-2016 to remain united. At a meeting called by M.G.C. on 7th August 2016 and attended by representatives of MGC, KDM, SNSM, Melaka Vidyala and Sikh Scholar’s a unanimous decision was taken that all Gurdwaras and Sikhs must abide by the SRM which hitherto had bound the Sikhs World wide like a glue.

    Not complying with SRM will bring disaster and disunity among the Sikhs. Just imagine having different Maryada regarding reciting Kirtan, Hukam Lena, Sadharan Path, Akhand Path, Gurbani di Katha, Anand Sanskar etc. if SRM as the uniting force is not followed.

    The following are Manmat Practises stated in the live telecast:

    1) That it is a parampra at Lakhi Jungle Gurdwara to do Parkash of Dasam Granth at par with SGGS Ji.

    [[[[[[[[[THERE IS NO PARAMPARA WITHIN MAIN STREAM GURDUARAS TO DO DISPLAY OR PRESENCE IN FORM OF THIS PORNO BOOK CALLED BN.THIS GURDUARA AT LAKHI JUNGLE MAY BE THAT BELONGS TO A CULTIST DERA, IT WILL NOT BE THE ONE MANAGED BY THE sgpc.

    ANSWER

    After Banda Singh Bahadur’s demise in 1716, the Sikhs were hunted and bounty placed on their heads. During this time anti Sikh forces took control of Gurdwaras and many manmat and anti Sikh practises were introduced.

    The Panth after deliberating from 1927 to 1945 approved the SRM in 1945 and outlawed many prevailing manmat and anti Sikh practises.

    [[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[THE MARYADA WAS DELIBERATED FROM 1927 -1945]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]

    In Lakhi Jungle Gurdwara, there is Parkash of 3 “Granth”, and not two as was stated in the live telecast, One is Dhan-Dhan Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji and there is also Parkash of BN (DG) and Sarabloh Granth.

    The Parkash at Titiwangsa Gurdwara of the BN (DG) is a clear violation of the SRM, although the Parkash may be on a temporary basis. The quoted Parampra of Lakhi Jungle is Manmat and is a serious transgression of SRM.

    WHY HAS ACADEMY and Gurdwara Sahib Titiwangsa not followed the Harmandir Sahib Parampra of removing BN (DG) from Harmandir Sahib in 1923. Also removed from Harmandir Sahib was Bhagwat Geeta and Hindu Godess statues.

    THE BHAGWAT GITA AND HINDUS GODDESS STATUES WERE REMOVED FROM HARMANDER SAHIB IN 1921.BACHITTER NATAK WAS NEVER DISPLAYED IN HARMANDER SAHIB

    There can be only one Guru or Emperor on the throne at one time or place.

    2) That BN (DG) Parkash was done in Harmandir Sahib until 1945.

    [[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[ANSWER–NO PARKASH OF BN WAS EVER DONE IN HARMANDER SAHIB OR MOST MAJOR GURDUARAS.

    I CHALLENGE THE SGGSA OPENLY TO PROVIDE FACTUAL EVIDENCE FROM HISTORY RECORDS.SGGSA IS LYING AS IT GOES ALONG WITH COOKED UP STROIES.I CHALLENGE ONE HUNDERED THOUSAND RINGGIT FOR SGGASA TO LAY ON THE TABLE , AND I WILL LAY THE SAME, FOR SGGSA TO COME UP WITH EVIDENCE THAT BN WAS EVER DISPLAYED FACTUALLY AT ANY TIME IN HARAMNDER SAHIB.

    Why was BN (DG) REMOVED FROM HARMANDIR SAHIB around 1921 (and not 1945 as claimed in the live video)==LIES-THERE NEVER WAS A BN IN HARMANDER SAHIB.THERE MAY HAVE BEEN ON THE FRINGES AMONG THE MANY DERA BUNGAS THAT CROPPED UP IN 1800S.

    This was because, the Parkash of BN (DG) in the presence of SGGS Ji was a manmat and was a serious transgression.

    Therefore, the numerous statues of Hindu Goddess were removed from Harmandir Sahib in 1920’s, too.

    3) The SRM (pg.11J) provides:

    ” ਸ੍ਰੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਜੀ ਦੇ ਵਾਕਰ (ਤੁੱਲ) ਕਿਸੇ ਪੁਸਤਕ ਨੂੰ ਅਸਥਾਪਨ ਨਹੀਂ ਕਰਨਾ “

    The relevant words in SRM are “Kitab”, “Parkash” and “Vakar” and in bracket “Tul”.

    This means there can be only ONE GRANTH in DARBAR. All others are “kitabs”, and Kitabs don’t come in rumalas, manji, chaur, asan etc.

    Therefore, Parkash of BN (DG) in Darbar of SGGS Ji has resulted in the following transgressions:
    1.To make the DG Kitab/book into a “granth” by faulty actions.
    2.To install it and give it the same reverence as SGGS Ji and in the presence of SGGS Ji.
    3.The closest word to “Tul” is Barabar (see Akal Takhat Gurmatta-1, where word Barabar is used) and in English is “on par”.

    “”By putting rumalas, manji, chaur, asan, etc, the DG has been put on par with SGGS Ji.

    The question of saying that BN (DG) is always placed one or two inches lower and placement is on left is nothing but to pull wool over the eyes””.

    THESE ARE ACTIONS OF DERAS, TKSAALIS, WHO CONSUME BHANG CHARS, SKUNK DRUGS, CAN THE SGGSA CONFIRM THIS IS ALSO WHAT THEY INTEND TO DO AS WELL, AS WELL AS PLACE THE BHAGWAT GITA AS THE NIRMALAS AND UDASI SADHS USED TO DO.

    In the DARBAR there can be only and only ONE AUTHORITY and to which to Tek Matha.

    GURU SAHIB GRANTED AUTHORITY ONLY TO GURU GRANTH.

    THERE IS A LOT OF HISTORICAL CONFUSION OVER 2DASVEN PATSHA DA GRANTH2-WHICH REFERS TO THE DAMDAMA BIR, WHICH GURU JI FIRST DICTATED TO MANI SINGH-THE SGGSA AND OTHER SUCH CULPRITS ARE MISUSING THIS HISTORICAL FACT TO IMPLY IT REFERS TO BN, NO IT DOES NOT.IT IS THE DAMADAMA BIR.

    There can be none other to challenge it whether sitting on the same height or lower or to the right or left.
    THIS THINKING SHOWS HOW MENTALY DEPRAVED THESE SGGSA AND ITS HEAD IS, TAKING SIKHS BACK INTO BRAHAMANISM AND DUMMY ACTS OF RITUALISTIC RELIGION, CALLED SNATANI DHARM.

    Sikh Neh Siraf SGGS Ji teh hi Nihcha rakhni hai ji, ehi Gurbani dha farmaan hai.

    ਹਰਿ ਇਕੋ ਦਾਤਾ ਸੇਵੀਐ ਹਰਿ ਇਕੁ ਧਿਆਈਐ ॥

    ਹਰਿ ਇਕੋ ਦਾਤਾ ਮੰਗੀਐ ਮਨ ਚਿੰਦਿਆ ਪਾਈਐ ॥

    ਜੇ ਦੂਜੇ ਪਾਸਹੁ ਮੰਗੀਐ ਤਾ ਲਾਜ ਮਰਾਈਐ ॥

    (Ang 590 SGGS Ji)

    [You must Serve and worship only ONE MASTER]

    Conclusion

    The Gurdwaras must take note of the above serious transgression of the SRM.

    The MGC had warned earlier that such actions will lead to disunity and we have been proven right.

    The MGC EXCO will meet urgently to decide on the next cause of action to be taken at this serious transgression of SRM and the clear Hukam of Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji :

    “SABH SIKHAN KO HUKAM HAI GURU MANIO GRANTH”

    Guru Gobind Singh Ji had himself bowed before Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji (the only Granth in Parkash), and bestowed “Gurta Gaddi” only on this Guru Granth Sahib Ji. Sikhs do not have any other Guru (Shabad Guru) except Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji.

    The Gurmata-1 by Akal Takhat dated 6.6.2008 refers to DG (BN) as “Literature & History” only and not even bani, let alone Gurbani, We quote from the Said Gurmatta:

    Translation:

    The whole of Sikh Panth is hereby informed that DG is an inseparable part of Sikh Litreture and Sikh History, but Guru Gobind Singh Ji did not award it the status equal to SGGS Ji. Guruship had been bestowed only and only on SGGS Ji. Due to this, no other Granth can be installed “Parkash” like and on par with SGGS Ji.

    THERE IS A LOT OF PUNJABI LITERATURE, BUT IT DOES NOT MAKE ANY LITERATURE GURBANI.CERTAINLY KAMASUTRIC TYPE WRITINGS FOUND IN BN ARE NOT GURU WRITINGS.THESE ARE ALSO FOUND IN CURRENT DAY PURANS , FROM WHERE THEY WERE COPIED AND THE GURU BLAMED FOR WRITING SUCH PORNO.

    THE EVIDENCE IS PRESENT TODAY,INTHE PURANS FROM WHERE IT [BN] WAS COPIED.THERE ARE MILLIONS OF COPIES OF THE THREE PURANS COPIED FROM-MARKANDIYE, SRI MAD AND SHIVE OR SRI PAD PURAN.SGGSA IS PULLING WOOL OVER THE EYES OF EVERYONE BY RESORTING TO OPEN LIES ON IT’S PART.

    PATNA HAS NO CAPACITY TO ISSUE ANY DIRECTIONS TO THE SIKH PANTH-IQBAL SINGH NEEDS TO ISSUE A HUKAMNAMA FOR HIMSELF-STOP MARRYING EACH WOMEN HE STRIKES WITH.HE HAS 7 WOMENS SO FAR, FOUR MARRIED AND TRHEE, UNOFFICIAL ON THE SIDE.HE NEEDS THE HUKAMNAMA TO STOP STOP COMMITTING SUCH GROSS ACTS AND ABUSING THE SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE.

    EK GRANTH EK PANTH EK MARYADA IS THE WAY FORWARD FOR SIKH UNITY UNDER GURU GRANTH SAHIB.

    NO DERA, NO SGGSA LIES,
    STICK PATNEWALA INTO PIES.

LEAVE A REPLY